• Make America Geeky Again (Berman) SOLUTIONS : Computer Simulation (displayed below on this webpage) of the 2020 Wisconsin Voting Returns' Anomalous Behavior (behavior as seen on broadcast returns)
• MAGeeky (Engineer Berman for Congress; Debugging the Constitution Project) demonstrates, by computer simulation, that it was completely reasonable to doubt the legitimacy of the highly-improbable 2020 Wisconsin returns, as they appeared on TV/internet (this was intuitively clear on election night, as well); and the broadcast returns were probably garbage due to Wisconsin's decentralized ("Veg-O-Matic") vote-count statute. But reaching the "garbage" conclusion takes some analysis and research — things the news media, including NPR, lack. (Yet another reason for seeing that no public money whatsoever funds NPR or its affiliates.)
• Keep this in mind if you watch the Wisconsin returns next week.
• Refresh this webpage repeatedly (and see below) for successive...
Random Sequences of the 72 Wisconsin Counties, SIMULATING 11/3/2020 Election Returns (drawn from final county tallies), showing cumulative Trump/Biden Vote Ratio as each county reports-in on the simulated sequence. I emphasize that this simulation addresses the specific question: is there any reporting sequence of counties, which gives the narrow Wisconsin T/B spread (ratio) seen throughout the election-night broadcast?
• It is very unlikely that there is any such sequence. This seemed clear two years ago, just by looking at the final, county-by-county results, and it was what I found disturbing, as I wrote.) THE VERY LIKELY ANSWER IS that the broadcast results were garbage, which I have (in essence) confirmed with the Wisconsin Elections Commission — garbage due to Wisconsin's distributed vote-counting law, with no central summation point on election night. However, the narrow T/B spread was indeed, on election night, strong evidence that the WI election returns were "extremely unlikely without some 'management,' manipulation, or cooking of the books. You simply cannot sample from ballot boxes with widely varying percentages and remain at nearly unchanged percentages without many remarkable coincidences," as I wrote. It was very reasonable to question the Wisconsin returns seen on TV/internet. That fishiness was definitely a strong basis for a "conspiracy theory," but when you investigate the source of the data (something the so-called "reporters" nowadays are not capable of, and merely spew their jargonistic "baseless" patter, which is what stupid, ignorant lawyers and judges do), you find a "Rube Goldberg meets veg-o-matic" election statute in Wisconsin. (However, click on the next page for the true bombshell Nantucket conspiracy theory!) Only by asking questions and doing some analysis and research—capabilities beyond the pseudo-reporters who just want people to "pay no attention to the" glaring irregularities "in front of the curtain" and in full view, because the media simply hate Trump and want him gone because he attacked the DC-NY nucleus-of-power "sacrosanct" institutions (and there is no sacrosanctity under our Constitution), including the media and the media's protected pets, the corrupt or incompetent judges (who comprise the large majority of judges) —can we get to the root cause, as explained on the next page (with additional, very lonnng comments between em-dashes).
• The simulated cumulative T/B ratio shows wide variations, in contrast with the very narrow < 5% lead of T over B (T/B≈1.1) throughout the evening, except at the very end. This supports (essentially "proves") my contention that the returns looked fishy and implausible. Refresh this page 72! times (~6•10¹⁰³ times) and see for yourself (after 10⁹⁹ years).  Not one sequence will maintain the very narrow T/B ratio (spread) that was on TV throughout the evening.   CLICK HERE for more explanation
• This is NOT a contention that "the election was 'stolen'," which is all the group-think, know-nothing, non-journalists can repeat as their mantra of "the LIE." (There was a time when there were real journalists, who would never describe an opinion as a "lie;" rather, they would write something like, "strongly disputed by such and such evidence;" and yes I will keep grinding this axe until some reporters wake up and look at, for example, the Minneapolis federal docket (case 20-1199) and see the root cause of Mr. Floyd's death: Minneapolis judges and lawyers and the 8th Circuit—the lawyer protection racket, one of many.)   Get a Free PACER Account and get Document 8-1 in case 20-1199 District of Minnesota...all you phony "journalists."

County Vote T/B | Ratio | Running Sum up to and including this County (Largest counties in red) REFRESH PAGE for a new random sequence